aware

The 1-Minute Brief

What: This presidential memorandum, issued on January 20, 2025, immediately freezes the hiring of Federal civilian employees across the executive branch. It prohibits filling vacant positions or creating new ones.

Money: The memorandum does not provide a specific cost savings estimate. However, it directs the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to develop a long-term plan to reduce the federal workforce through attrition and efficiency improvements. Past analyses by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) have found that similar freezes had little effect on overall employment levels and, in some cases, increased costs due to overtime pay and the hiring of more expensive contractors.

Your Impact: If you are seeking employment with the federal government, your opportunities will be significantly limited. For the general public, the freeze could lead to longer wait times for government services, as agencies may face staffing shortages.

Status: This is a Presidential Memorandum, which is a form of executive action. It took effect at noon on January 20, 2025.

What's Actually in the Bill

This Presidential Memorandum halts all hiring of civilian employees in the executive branch of the U.S. government. Any position that was vacant as of noon on January 20, 2025, cannot be filled, and no new positions can be created. The directive applies to all executive departments and agencies, regardless of their funding sources.

Core Provisions:

Immediate Hiring Freeze: Prohibits the hiring of Federal civilian employees and the creation of new positions effective January 20, 2025.
Exemptions: The freeze does not apply to military personnel. It also exempts positions related to immigration enforcement, national security, or public safety. The Director of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) can grant additional exemptions if deemed necessary.
Protected Services: The memorandum states that the provision of Social Security, Medicare, or Veterans' benefits should not be adversely impacted.
Long-Term Reduction Plan: The Director of the OMB, in consultation with other officials, must submit a plan within 90 days to reduce the size of the federal workforce through attrition and improved efficiencies.
Expiration: The freeze expires for most agencies upon the issuance of the OMB's plan. However, it will remain in effect indefinitely for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), until the Secretary of the Treasury determines lifting it is in the national interest.
No Contracting Loophole: The memorandum explicitly prohibits agencies from hiring outside contractors to perform the work of frozen positions.
Non-Career Staff: The freeze does not limit the appointment of political officials, such as those requiring Presidential appointment or Senate confirmation, or other non-career employees.

Stated Purpose (from the Sponsors):

The memorandum directs the heads of executive departments and agencies to seek the efficient use of existing staff and funds to improve public services. The stated goal is to pave the way for a long-term reduction in the size of the federal government's workforce.

Key Facts:

Affected Sectors: All sectors of the Federal Government's executive branch, with specific long-term focus on the Internal Revenue Service.
Timeline: The freeze began on January 20, 2025. A workforce reduction plan is due by mid-April 2025. The freeze for most agencies will lift after that plan is issued, but subsequent hiring may be limited.
Scope: The action is limited to the civilian workforce of the executive branch of the U.S. federal government; it does not apply to the military, legislative, or judicial branches.

The Backstory: How We Got Here

Timeline of Events:

The Era of "Wasteful Spending" Concerns (1970s-1980s):

Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan both instituted federal hiring freezes as a tool to control government growth and spending. However, a 1982 report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) concluded these freezes were largely ineffective. The GAO found they had "little effect on Federal employment levels," disrupted agency operations, and sometimes increased costs by forcing agencies to pay overtime or hire more expensive contractors to fulfill their missions.

Post-Cold War Drawdown and Modernization (1990s-2010s):

While large-scale freezes became less common, efforts to "reinvent" and streamline government continued. In November 2016, President Obama enacted a more targeted freeze on the hiring of Senior Executive Service positions. This period also saw federal employee pay freezes.

The Trump Administration and Renewed Focus on Shrinking Government (2017-Present):

On January 23, 2017, President Donald Trump signed a similar memorandum instituting a 90-day federal hiring freeze. That freeze was lifted in April 2017 and replaced with guidance for agencies to reduce their workforce. During the 2024 presidential campaign, promises were made to again reduce the size and scope of the federal government, setting the stage for the current memorandum. The creation of a "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE) was also announced to spearhead these efforts.

Why Now? The Political Calculus:

Fulfilling a Campaign Promise: The hiring freeze is a direct and immediate fulfillment of a key campaign pledge to shrink the federal bureaucracy.
Partisan Divide on Government: There is a significant partisan gap in confidence in federal employees, with Republicans and Republican-leaners expressing much lower levels of trust than Democrats. This action aligns with the viewpoint that the federal workforce is too large and inefficient.
Setting the Tone: Issuing this memorandum on "Day One" signals a strong commitment to an agenda of fiscal conservatism and government restructuring, energizing a political base that is skeptical of the federal government.

Your Real-World Impact

The Direct Answer: This memorandum directly affects anyone seeking a civilian job with the federal government and current federal employees whose agencies will be short-staffed; it will likely have an indirect impact on most Americans through its effect on government services.

What Could Change for You:

Potential Benefits:

Taxpayer Savings: If the freeze and subsequent attrition plan successfully reduce the size of the federal workforce without increasing other costs, it could lead to long-term savings for taxpayers.
Increased Efficiency: Proponents argue that the freeze will force government agencies to innovate and become more efficient with their existing resources.

Possible Disruptions or Costs:

Short-term (Next 3-12 months):

Job Application Freezes: If you are a job seeker, applications for most federal positions will not be accepted or processed.
Service Delays: With fewer staff, you could experience longer waits for services like processing tax returns (especially with the extended freeze on the IRS), passport applications, and responses from federal agencies.
Increased Workload for Current Employees: Federal workers may face higher workloads and burnout as colleagues who leave are not replaced, potentially impacting morale and the quality of services.

Long-term:

Degradation of Government Services: Critics warn that a sustained reduction in the workforce without a corresponding reduction in agency missions could lead to a decline in the quality and availability of public services.
Skills Gaps: A prolonged freeze can create critical skills gaps in areas like cybersecurity, engineering, and medicine as experienced personnel retire and are not replaced.
Higher Costs: History suggests that agencies may be forced to rely on more expensive private contractors to perform essential functions, potentially negating any savings from the freeze.

Who's Most Affected:

Primary Groups: Recent college graduates and individuals actively seeking federal employment; current federal employees in non-exempt agencies.
Secondary Groups: Government contractors who may see either a decrease or increase in work, depending on how agencies respond; citizens who rely on federal services, especially from the IRS; and veterans seeking services from the VA, though the memorandum aims to protect these benefits.
Regional Impact: The freeze has a nationwide impact, as over 80% of federal employees work outside of the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.

Bottom Line: While intended to reduce government spending, the hiring freeze is likely to make it harder to get a federal job and could slow down the government services you use.

Where the Parties Stand

Republican Position: "Shrinking Bureaucracy, Saving Taxpayer Dollars"

Core Stance: Generally supports measures to reduce the size of the federal workforce, viewing it as a way to cut wasteful spending and improve government efficiency.

Their Arguments:

✓ Proponents argue that the federal government is bloated and that a hiring freeze is a necessary first step to control its growth.
✓ They believe this action will force agencies to streamline operations and make better use of taxpayer money.
✓ The freeze is seen as fulfilling a promise to voters to make government more accountable and less intrusive.

Legislative Strategy: As this is an executive action, the strategy is one of implementation through the Office of Management and Budget and agency heads. This includes developing the follow-on attrition plan and defending the action against legal and political challenges.

Democratic Position: "Harming Services and Federal Workers"

Core Stance: Generally opposes across-the-board hiring freezes, arguing they are a blunt instrument that harms government functions and is ultimately counterproductive.

Their Arguments:

✓ Critics contend that freezes disrupt essential government services that Americans rely on, from food safety inspections to Social Security administration.
⚠️ They warn that freezes can increase long-term costs by forcing agencies to pay excessive overtime or hire expensive contractors.
✗ Opponents argue that such freezes demoralize the federal workforce, worsen existing skills gaps, and prevent the government from hiring new talent.

Legislative Strategy: The primary strategy is to publicly oppose the memorandum, highlight potential negative impacts on constituent services, and potentially support legal challenges from federal employee unions.

Constitutional Check

The Verdict: ✓ Constitutional

Basis of Authority:

The President's authority to issue this memorandum stems from their role as the head of the executive branch under Article II of the U.S. Constitution. Federal law also grants the President authority to regulate individuals in the civil service.

Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution: "[The] executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America."
Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution: "[The President] shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed..."

Constitutional Implications:

Executive Power: The President has broad authority to manage the operations of the executive branch, which has been consistently interpreted by courts to include the power over hiring and personnel decisions.
Precedent: Past presidents from both parties have implemented hiring freezes via executive action, and these actions have generally been understood to be within the president's authority. A 1981 court case, National Treasury Employees Union v. Ronald Reagan, affirmed that job offers could be rescinded under a retroactive freeze because the individuals were not yet federal employees.
Federalism: This action applies only to the federal executive branch and does not overstep into powers reserved for the states.

Potential Legal Challenges:

The most likely legal challenges would come from federal employee unions. They may argue that the freeze is arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act or that it violates specific statutes governing federal personnel. However, based on precedent, a broad constitutional challenge is unlikely to succeed.

Your Action Options

TO SUPPORT THIS BILL

5-Minute Actions:

Contact the White House: Express your support for the Presidential Memorandum on the Hiring Freeze through the official White House comment line or website.
Share Information on Social Media: Share news articles and commentary that support the goal of reducing the size of the federal government.

30-Minute Deep Dive:

Write a Letter to the Editor: Submit a letter to your local newspaper explaining why you believe a federal hiring freeze is a positive step for fiscal responsibility.
Join an Organization: Join and support advocacy groups that favor smaller government and reduced federal spending.
- Americans for Prosperity
- FreedomWorks
- Citizens United

TO OPPOSE THIS BILL

5-Minute Actions:

Call Your Rep/Senators: Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121. "I'm a constituent from [Your City/Town] and I am concerned about the negative impacts of the Presidential Memorandum to freeze federal hiring. I urge [Rep./Sen. Name] to speak out against it and work to protect federal services."

30-Minute Deep Dive:

Write a Detailed Email: Contact your congressional representatives and the leadership of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability and the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs to detail your concerns about how the freeze will affect specific government services.
Join an Organization: Join and support federal employee unions or advocacy groups that oppose the hiring freeze.
- American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE)
- National Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE)
- National Active and Retired Federal Employees (NARFE) Association