aware

The 1-Minute Brief

What: Executive Order 14165, titled "Securing Our Borders," mandates a series of aggressive actions to curtail illegal immigration at the U.S. southern border. Key measures include resuming construction of the border wall, ending the policy known as "catch-and-release," reinstating the "Remain in Mexico" program for asylum seekers, and terminating specific parole programs that allow certain nationals to enter the U.S. (Sec. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7).

Money: The order does not specify funding, stating actions are "subject to the availability of appropriations" (Sec. 12). However, implementation would require substantial public funds. Previous border wall construction has cost between $20 million to $30 million per mile. The daily cost of immigrant detention was approximately $187 per adult in fiscal year 2023. A 2025 legislative proposal aligned with these goals included $46.5 billion for wall construction and funding to raise daily detention capacity to 100,000 people.

Your Impact: For most Americans, the impact is indirect, related to the use of federal tax dollars for enforcement and potential shifts in the national economy. For individuals in border communities, it could mean increased law enforcement presence and construction activity. For U.S. citizens with non-citizen family members, it could significantly impact their ability to have relatives enter or remain in the country.

Status: The Executive Order was signed and went into effect on January 20, 2025.

What's Actually in the Bill

Executive Order 14165 directs federal departments to use their full authority to restrict entry, detain, and remove non-citizens who lack a legal basis to be in the United States. It frames the situation at the southern border as a "large-scale invasion" and aims to achieve "complete operational control" (Sec. 1, 2).

Core Provisions:

Border Wall: The Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security are ordered to use all appropriate action to construct "temporary and permanent physical barriers" along the entire southern border (Sec. 3).
End "Catch-and-Release": The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) must end the practice of releasing apprehended migrants into the U.S. and instead detain them to the "fullest extent permitted by law" until they are removed (Sec. 5).
Resume "Remain in Mexico": The Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) will be reinstated "as soon as practicable." This policy requires asylum seekers to wait in Mexico for the duration of their U.S. immigration court proceedings (Sec. 6).
End Parole Programs: The order terminates the use of the CBP One mobile app for parole purposes and ends "categorical parole programs," specifically naming the process for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans (CHNV) (Sec. 7).
Personnel Deployment: The Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security, along with the Attorney General, are to deploy "sufficient personnel" to the southern border to enforce immigration laws (Sec. 4).
DNA Collection: The order directs the Attorney General and DHS to fully implement the DNA Fingerprint Act of 2005, which requires DNA collection from individuals detained under federal authority (Sec. 9).
Increased Prosecution: The Attorney General is instructed to prioritize the prosecution of crimes related to human smuggling and trafficking (Sec. 10).

Stated Purpose (from the Sponsors):

The order states its purpose is to protect the American people from what it describes as the "disastrous effects of unlawful mass migration" (Sec. 1).

End the "large-scale invasion" and threats from potential terrorists, cartels, and other hostile actors (Sec. 1).
Stop the flow of deadly narcotics into the United States (Sec. 1).
Re-establish the rule of law and American sovereignty by ending "catch-and-release" policies (Sec. 1).
Obtain complete operational control of the U.S. borders (Sec. 2).

Key Facts:

Affected Sectors: Homeland Security, Defense, Justice Department, State Department, and State & Local Law Enforcement.
Timeline: The order took effect on January 20, 2025. Reinstatement of the "Remain in Mexico" policy is to occur "as soon as practicable" (Sec. 6). Relevant department heads were given 14 days to recommend further actions (Sec. 11).
Scope: The order's provisions are focused on the U.S. southern border but have significant international implications, particularly for Mexico and asylum seekers from all nations, especially Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.

The Backstory: How We Got Here

Timeline of Events:

Trump Administration (2017-2021):

Policies during this era focused heavily on deterrence. Key actions included initiating the construction of a border wall, implementing the Migrant Protection Protocols ("Remain in Mexico") which sent over 71,000 asylum seekers back to Mexico, and using the public health authority known as Title 42 to rapidly expel migrants without an asylum screening.

Biden Administration (2021-2025):

This administration reversed many of its predecessor's policies. It officially terminated the "Remain in Mexico" program, citing its "unjustifiable human costs," and ended the national emergency used to divert military funds for the wall. It introduced new parole programs, including one for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans (CHNV), and utilized the CBP One app to schedule asylum appointments. These policies were paired with enforcement measures, but the administration faced record levels of migrant encounters at the border.

Why Now? The Political Calculus:

Fulfilling a Mandate: This executive order was issued on the first day of a new presidential term, demonstrating a commitment to fulfilling campaign promises centered on aggressive immigration enforcement.
Immediate Reversal: The timing signals an urgent and complete repudiation of the previous administration's approach, which the order describes as creating an "unprecedented flood" (Sec. 1).
Setting the Tone: By declaring the situation an "invasion" and ordering the use of all available resources, the administration is establishing a hardline posture intended to deter migration and satisfy its political base.

Your Real-World Impact

The Direct Answer: This directly and significantly affects asylum seekers, migrants, and communities along the U.S.-Mexico border, while indirectly affecting all Americans through federal spending and policy debates.

What Could Change for You:

Potential Benefits:

Supporters argue these measures will enhance national security by gaining control of the border, reducing the flow of illicit drugs like fentanyl, and deterring illegal immigration.
A reduction in the number of individuals released into the country could alleviate strain on social services in border communities.
Proponents believe it restores the "rule of law" by ending policies perceived as encouraging illegal entry.

Possible Disruptions or Costs:

Short-term (First 1-2 Years):

Taxpayers will bear the significant costs of wall construction, increased personnel deployment, and expanded immigrant detention.
Asylum seekers will face prolonged waits in potentially dangerous conditions in Mexico or be held in U.S. detention facilities.
Border communities may experience environmental and economic disruption from wall construction.

Long-term:

The U.S. asylum system could be fundamentally altered, making it much more difficult for individuals to seek protection.
Diplomatic relations with Mexico and other Latin American countries may be strained due to the return of large numbers of non-Mexican nationals to Mexican territory.
Successful legal challenges could halt some of these policies, leading to a protracted state of flux in immigration enforcement.

Who's Most Affected:

Primary Groups: Asylum seekers and migrants at the southern border, particularly those from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela who were previously eligible for parole programs.
Secondary Groups: Federal employees at DHS, DOD, and DOJ; humanitarian aid workers; immigration lawyers; U.S. taxpayers; and residents of border communities.
Regional Impact: The U.S. states of Texas, Arizona, California, and New Mexico, along with Mexican border cities, will experience the most direct operational, social, and economic effects.

Bottom Line: The order fundamentally overhauls U.S. border policy to prioritize restriction and detention over pathways to entry, directly impacting migrants and carrying a significant price tag for U.S. taxpayers.

Where the Parties Stand

Republican Position: "Seal the Border, And Stop the Migrant Invasion"

Core Stance: The party strongly supports the measures in this executive order, aligning with its platform's top priorities.

Their Arguments:

✓ Complete the border wall and use all necessary resources, including the military, to stop illegal crossings.
✓ Reinstate the "Remain in Mexico" policy and end "catch-and-release."
✓ Carry out the largest deportation operation in American history and strengthen ICE.
✗ Oppose "open-border policies" that they argue have led to a crisis of crime and drug trafficking.

Legislative Strategy: To support this executive order with congressional appropriations for the wall, detention beds, and enforcement personnel, and to pass legislation that makes these policies permanent law.

Democratic Position: "Fixing Our Broken Immigration System"

Core Stance: The party opposes the policies in this order, advocating for a system that combines border security with humane processing and legal pathways.

Their Arguments:

✓ Expand legal pathways for immigration to alleviate pressure at the border and support a path to citizenship for long-term undocumented residents.
✓ Address the root causes of migration and manage the border in a safe, orderly, and humane way.
✗ Oppose mass deportations, family separations, and the construction of an expensive and ineffective border wall.
✗ Criticize policies like "Remain in Mexico" as inhumane and dangerous for vulnerable asylum seekers.

Legislative Strategy: To block funding for measures like the border wall and mass detention, to challenge the legality of the executive order in court, and to propose comprehensive immigration reform that includes both border security funding and a pathway to citizenship.

Constitutional Check

The Verdict: ⚠️ Questionable

Basis of Authority:

The order cites the President's authority under the Constitution and the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (Sec. 1). Specifically, it relies on broad powers granted to the executive branch to control the entry of non-citizens. A key statute is Section 212(f) of the INA, which states:

"[W]henever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation... suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens... or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

Constitutional Implications:

Executive Authority: The Supreme Court has historically interpreted the president's authority under the INA as very broad. However, critics argue these actions exceed that authority and attempt to rewrite immigration law, a power reserved for Congress.
Precedent: Previous attempts to divert military funds for border wall construction were met with numerous legal challenges, with some federal courts ruling the action was an illegal sidestepping of Congress's power of the purse. The legality of the "Remain in Mexico" policy has also been heavily litigated, with the Supreme Court ultimately ruling the Biden administration had the authority to end it.
Due Process: Forcing asylum seekers to wait in Mexico raises significant due process and humanitarian concerns, as their ability to access U.S. legal counsel and the safety of their environment are compromised.

Potential Legal Challenges:

This executive order is almost certain to face immediate and numerous lawsuits from civil liberties organizations, immigrant rights groups, and environmental advocates. Legal challenges will likely focus on:

The termination of parole programs and new restrictions on asylum access, arguing they violate the INA.
The legality of reinstating the "Remain in Mexico" policy.
Any attempt to divert funds for wall construction without explicit congressional approval, citing a violation of the separation of powers.

Your Action Options

TO SUPPORT THIS BILL

5-Minute Actions:

Call Your Rep/Senators: Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121 "I'm a constituent from [Your City/Town] and I urge [Rep./Sen. Name] to support Executive Order 14165 and vote to fund its border security measures."

30-Minute Deep Dive:

Write a Detailed Email: Contact members of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees to advocate for funding the measures in the order.
Join an Organization: Groups that advocate for stricter immigration controls include the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) and the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS).

TO OPPOSE THIS BILL

5-Minute Actions:

Call Your Rep/Senators: Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121 "I'm a constituent from [Your City/Town] and I urge [Rep./Sen. Name] to oppose Executive Order 14165 and to block funding for the border wall and mass detention."

30-Minute Deep Dive:

Write a Letter to the Editor: Submit a letter to your local newspaper outlining your concerns about the humanitarian and financial costs of the order.
Join an Organization: Groups that advocate for immigrant rights include the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the National Immigration Law Center (NILC), RAICES, and the Immigration Advocates Network.