aware

The 1-Minute Brief

What: Executive Order 14216, "Expanding Access to In Vitro Fertilization," directs the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy to develop and present policy recommendations aimed at protecting and increasing access to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and lowering its cost.

Money: The order itself does not appropriate funds but addresses the high cost of IVF, which can range from $12,000 to over $25,000 per cycle. The average patient undergoes multiple cycles, potentially spending over $50,000. Recommendations could lead to future legislative proposals or regulatory changes affecting health insurance and out-of-pocket costs.

Your Impact: This executive order signals a potential for future federal policies that could make IVF treatments more affordable and accessible, possibly through insurance mandates or other cost-reduction measures.

Status: The Executive Order was signed on February 18, 2025. The Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy is required to submit policy recommendations within 90 days of this date.

What's Actually in the Bill

This executive order establishes a formal policy of the administration to support family formation by ensuring reliable and affordable access to IVF treatments. It initiates a process to identify and recommend specific actions to achieve this goal. The core of the order is a directive for a top White House advisor to study the issue and propose solutions.

Core Provisions:

Policy Goal: To make it easier for people to have children by ensuring reliable access to IVF and making treatments "drastically more affordable."
Action Item: Within 90 days of February 18, 2025, the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy must submit a list of policy recommendations to the President.
Focus of Recommendations: The recommendations are to focus on two main areas: protecting access to IVF and "aggressively reducing" the costs paid by patients and health plans.

Stated Purpose (from the Sponsors):

The stated purpose is to support hopeful parents facing infertility, which affects as many as one in seven couples.

Recognize the emotional and financial struggles associated with infertility.
Affirm that public policy should make it easier for families to have children.
Address the high cost of IVF, which is a significant barrier for many.

Key Facts:

Affected Sectors: Healthcare, Insurance.
Timeline: Policy recommendations are due to the President by mid-May 2025.
Scope: The order is national in scope, aiming to affect IVF access and costs across the United States.

The Backstory: How We Got Here

Timeline of Events:

The Scientific and Social Era (1970s-2000s):

1973: The Supreme Court's decision in Roe v. Wade led Congress to ban federal funding for most human embryo research, shaping a privatized, market-driven landscape for reproductive technologies in the U.S.
1981: The first baby in the U.S. is born using IVF, marking a new era for fertility treatment.
1990s: Some states began passing bipartisan laws requiring insurance coverage for IVF to promote family building. However, national coverage remained inconsistent, with most patients paying out-of-pocket.

The Political Battleground (2022-Present):

June 2022: The Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturns Roe v. Wade, ending the federal right to abortion and opening the door for states to regulate reproductive healthcare more broadly. This decision intensified the debate around when life begins.
February 2024: The Alabama Supreme Court rules that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law, leading several clinics in the state to pause IVF services out of fear of legal liability. The decision sparks a national outcry and highlights the potential vulnerability of IVF.
March 2024: In response to public pressure, Alabama's legislature passes a law to provide legal protections to IVF clinics, and services resume.
2024-2025: In Congress, Democrats force multiple votes on the "Right to IVF Act," which aims to establish a nationwide right to IVF and make it more affordable. Republicans repeatedly block the bill, arguing it is overly broad, and propose their own narrower legislation.

Why Now? The Political Calculus:

Post-Dobbs Environment: The overturning of Roe v. Wade has made all aspects of reproductive healthcare a central political issue.
Alabama Ruling: The Alabama court decision transformed IVF from a personal medical issue into a national political flashpoint, forcing politicians to take a clear stance.
Public Opinion: IVF is overwhelmingly popular across the political spectrum, making support for the procedure a politically safe and advantageous position.
Election Year Pressure: With reproductive rights being a key issue for voters, both parties are keen to demonstrate their support for family-building options like IVF. This executive order allows the President to take decisive action and frame the narrative on the issue.

Your Real-World Impact

The Direct Answer: This directly affects Americans struggling with infertility by signaling potential future government action to lower the significant financial burden of IVF.

What Could Change for You:

Potential Benefits:

Lower Costs: Future policies resulting from this order could lead to requirements for more comprehensive insurance coverage, potentially saving families tens of thousands of dollars.
Expanded Access: Policies could make IVF an option for more people who are currently priced out of the treatment.
Protected Services: Recommendations could lead to federal protections for IVF, safeguarding it from state-level restrictions.

Possible Disruptions or Costs:

Short-term (1-2 years):

Uncertainty: There are no immediate changes. The impact depends entirely on what policies are recommended and whether they can be implemented through executive action or passed by Congress.

Long-term:

Insurance Premiums: If insurers are mandated to cover IVF more comprehensively, it could potentially lead to minor increases in health insurance premiums for all members, though this is speculative.
Regulatory Changes: New federal regulations could change how fertility clinics operate or are reimbursed.

Who's Most Affected:

Primary Groups:

Couples and individuals experiencing infertility.
LGBTQ+ couples and individuals seeking to build families.
People with genetic dispositions for diseases who use IVF for pre-implantation genetic testing.
Secondary Groups:
Fertility clinics and healthcare providers.
Health insurance companies.
Employers who sponsor health plans.
Regional Impact: The impact could be greatest in the 29 states that do not currently have any form of mandate for private insurance to cover IVF treatment.

Bottom Line: This executive order is the first step in a process that could eventually make starting a family through IVF a more financially viable and legally secure option for millions of Americans.

Where the Parties Stand

Republican Position: "We Support IVF, But Through a Different Approach"

Core Stance: The party platform supports IVF, but Republicans in Congress generally oppose broad federal mandates, preferring state-level control and more targeted legislative solutions.

Their Arguments:

✓ Republicans broadly express strong support for the availability of IVF treatments.
✓ Some Republicans have introduced legislation to protect IVF by linking it to state Medicaid funding.
⚠️ The party's platform includes support for "fetal personhood," which creates a direct conflict with the standard practice of IVF that often involves the disposal of non-viable embryos.
✗ Most congressional Republicans have voted against Democratic-led bills to create a federal statutory right to IVF, arguing they are overly broad and constitute federal overreach.

Legislative Strategy: Block broad Democratic bills and propose more limited legislation that encourages states to protect IVF without creating a new federal right or insurance mandate.

Democratic Position: "Protect IVF as a Fundamental Right"

Core Stance: The party strongly supports establishing a federal right to access IVF and mandating insurance coverage to make it more affordable.

Their Arguments:

✓ Democrats champion IVF as a critical family-building tool that should be protected and accessible to all.
✓ They have introduced the "Right to IVF Act" and "Access to Family Building Act" to codify protections into federal law.
⚠️ Democrats argue that without federal protection, IVF remains vulnerable to state-level restrictions and court rulings, similar to what happened in Alabama.
✗ They oppose Republican proposals as insufficient and lacking meaningful enforcement mechanisms to truly protect access.

Legislative Strategy: Push for floor votes on comprehensive IVF protection bills to highlight the issue and create a clear political contrast, while arguing that Republican-led efforts are inadequate.

Constitutional Check

The Verdict: ✓ Constitutional

Basis of Authority:

The President's authority to issue this executive order stems from Article II of the Constitution, which grants the President broad executive power to manage the operations of the federal government and direct executive branch officials. The order specifically directs an assistant within the executive branch to develop policy proposals.

Relevant Portion of the Constitution (Article II, Section 1): "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America."
Relevant Portion of the Constitution (Article II, Section 3): "...he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed..."

Constitutional Implications:

Executive Power: The order is a valid exercise of the President's power to direct the executive branch to study an issue and make policy recommendations. It does not, by itself, create new law or appropriate funds.
Precedent: Presidents of both parties have historically used executive orders to direct policy development on a wide range of domestic issues.
Federalism: This order does not directly infringe on powers reserved to the states. However, any subsequent legislation or regulation that might arise from its recommendations, such as a federal insurance mandate, would likely face legal challenges based on federalism and the scope of congressional power under the Commerce Clause.

Potential Legal Challenges:

The executive order itself is unlikely to face a successful legal challenge as it primarily directs internal executive branch processes. However, any future actions stemming from the order's recommendations—such as attempting to mandate insurance coverage without congressional approval—would almost certainly be challenged in court as presidential overreach.

Your Action Options

TO SUPPORT THIS BILL

5-Minute Actions:

Call Your Rep/Senators: Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121. "I'm a constituent from [Your City/Town] and I support Executive Order 14216. I urge [Rep./Sen. Name] to support federal legislation that protects and expands access to IVF, like the Access to Family Building Act."

30-Minute Deep Dive:

Write a Detailed Email: Contact your elected officials and members of the House and Senate health committees to share your personal story and express support for federal protections for IVF.
Join an Organization: Groups like RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) advocate for IVF access.

TO OPPOSE THIS BILL

5-Minute Actions:

Call Your Rep/Senators: Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121. "I'm a constituent from [Your City/Town]. While I may support IVF, I am concerned about federal overreach. I urge [Rep./Sen. Name] to oppose any new federal mandates on IVF and keep these decisions at the state level."

30-Minute Deep Dive:

Write a Letter to the Editor: Submit a letter to your local newspaper expressing your views on why the federal government should not be involved in regulating fertility treatments.
Join an Organization: Groups that advocate for states' rights or have moral or ethical objections to IVF may oppose federal action on this issue.