06-18-2025

Authorizing Green Corridors, LLC, To Construct, Maintain, and Operate a Commercial Elevated Guideway Border Crossing Near Laredo, Texas, at the International Boundary Between the United States and Mexico

Other Presidential DocumentView the Original .pdf
View the Original .pdf

The 1-Minute Brief

What: A Presidential Permit authorizes a private company, Green Corridors, LLC, to build and operate a 165-mile, elevated guideway for autonomous, electric freight shuttles to transport cargo between Laredo, Texas, and Monterrey, Mexico. The system is designed to bypass road traffic and streamline the customs process for commercial goods.

Money: The project is estimated to cost $10 billion and is entirely privately funded by a consortium of investors, requiring no taxpayer money. The company will generate revenue by charging fees to freight carriers who use the system.

Your Impact: For the average American, the most likely impact will be indirect, potentially leading to more resilient supply chains and faster delivery of goods from Mexico. It will not directly cost taxpayers. For those in the Laredo, TX area, it could mean less truck traffic and congestion on local roads.

Status: The Presidential Permit was granted on June 9, 2025. The project must still complete environmental reviews and secure final approvals from Mexican authorities before construction can begin.

What's Actually in the Bill

This Presidential Permit grants federal permission to Green Corridors, LLC, to construct and operate a private, commercial border crossing for freight. The "Intelligent Freight Transportation System" (IFTS) will function like a conveyor belt for semi-trailers, moving them on autonomous electric shuttles along a fixed, elevated guideway, separate from public highways. This is intended to create a faster, more secure, and environmentally cleaner alternative to moving goods by diesel trucks across existing, congested international bridges.

Core Provisions:

  • Authorization: Grants Green Corridors, LLC, the right to construct, maintain, and operate a commercial elevated guideway and bridge over the Rio Grande. [Source Document: Preamble]
  • Private Funding: The permittee is responsible for all costs related to construction, operation, maintenance, and staffing of inspection facilities for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), at no cost to the U.S. government. [Source Document: Article 7]
  • Regulatory Oversight: The project is subject to inspection and regulation by all relevant federal, state, and local agencies, including the Department of Transportation and the International Boundary and Water Commission. [Source Document: Articles 2, 8, 9]
  • Security Integration: The system will allow for 100% of freight to be scanned and integrated with CBP inspection protocols, a significant increase from current scanning rates.
  • Construction Deadline: The permit will expire on June 9, 2030, if construction has not commenced. [Source Document: Article 14]

Stated Purpose (from the Sponsors):

Green Corridors, LLC, and its supporters state the project is designed to achieve the following:

  1. Reduce Congestion and Costs: Alleviate significant traffic bottlenecks at the Laredo Port of Entry, reducing transportation costs and wait times.
  2. Enhance Security: Improve border security by creating a closed-loop system where 100% of cargo can be scanned and monitored.
  3. Increase Trade Efficiency: Create additional capacity to support growing trade with Mexico and strengthen supply chain resiliency.
  4. Improve Air Quality: Reduce carbon emissions by up to 75% compared to diesel trucks by using low-emission, electric shuttles and eliminating idling in traffic.

Key Facts:

Affected Sectors: Transportation, International Trade, Logistics, Automotive, Manufacturing.
Timeline: The company anticipates breaking ground within 36 months (mid-2028) and beginning operations as early as 2031.
Scope: The project consists of a 165-mile elevated guideway connecting a terminal north of Laredo, Texas (near I-35) with an inland terminal near Monterrey, Mexico.

The Backstory: How We Got Here

Timeline of Events:

The Laredo Bottleneck (2010s-Present):

The Port of Laredo is the busiest inland port in the United States, a critical artery for U.S.-Mexico trade. In 2024, the port handled $339 billion in trade. This massive volume has led to severe congestion.

  • In 2015, the port's World Trade Bridge was already processing over 12,000 commercial vehicles daily.
  • By 2023, the port handled nearly 5.84 million truck crossings for the year, with an average of over 18,500 north and southbound trucks crossing daily.
  • This intense traffic creates long wait times for truckers, increases fuel consumption and emissions from idling vehicles, and strains local infrastructure, prompting calls for innovative solutions.

Why Now? The Political Calculus:

  • Supply Chain Woes: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed deep vulnerabilities in global supply chains, increasing the political and economic appetite for solutions that strengthen trade with neighboring countries ("nearshoring"). This project is seen as a way to make the U.S.-Mexico supply chain more resilient.
  • Bipartisan Infrastructure Focus: While privately funded, the project aligns with a broader, bipartisan consensus on the need to modernize U.S. infrastructure to remain globally competitive. The project has received praise from both Democratic and Republican officials in Texas.
  • Technological Maturity: The convergence of autonomous vehicle technology, electric propulsion, and advanced logistics software has made a project of this scale and complexity feasible for the first time.

Your Real-World Impact

The Direct Answer: This project directly affects the logistics and transportation industries and has a significant local impact in South Texas, while the effects on most other Americans will be indirect.

What Could Change for You:

Potential Benefits:

  • More Reliable Shopping: A more efficient and less congested trade corridor could mean fewer delays and more reliability in the supply of vehicles, electronics, and produce from Mexico.
  • Environmental Gains: For Texans, particularly in the Laredo area, diverting thousands of trucks from highways to a cleaner, electric system could noticeably improve air quality and reduce traffic noise.
  • Economic Growth: The project is projected to create approximately 600 construction jobs and 6,500 permanent jobs in the region, boosting the local economy.

Possible Disruptions or Costs:

Short-term (2028-2031):

  • Construction along the 165-mile corridor could cause localized traffic and environmental disruptions for communities along the route.

Long-term:

  • Shifts in Trucking: The system could disrupt the traditional long-haul trucking industry along this specific route, shifting jobs from drivers to terminal operators and technicians.
  • Land Use: Construction of the elevated guideway and terminals will permanently change the landscape and require the acquisition of right-of-way, potentially affecting landowners. [Source Document: Article 6]

Who's Most Affected:

Primary Groups: Trucking companies, freight forwarders, manufacturers in the U.S. and Mexico, and residents of Webb County, TX, and surrounding areas.
Secondary Groups: U.S. consumers of goods imported from Mexico, auto industry workers, and businesses dependent on cross-border trade.
Regional Impact: The project's economic and environmental impact is heavily concentrated in South Texas and the Mexican state of Nuevo Leon.

Bottom Line: This project aims to make moving goods across the border faster, cheaper, and cleaner, which could translate to more stable prices and availability for consumers, at the cost of disrupting the traditional trucking model on this major trade route.

Where the Parties Stand

Republican Position: "A Privately-Funded, Market-Driven Solution"

Core Stance: Supportive, praising the project's private funding model and its potential to boost trade and security without public expenditure.

Their Arguments:

  • ✓ Lauds the $10 billion private investment as a model for infrastructure development.
  • ✓ Supports the project's goal of enhancing border security through better technology and separating commercial traffic.
  • ✓ Sees it as a way to facilitate more efficient trade with Mexico, a key economic partner.

Legislative Strategy: To support the project's progress by ensuring federal agencies conduct timely reviews and cooperate with the developers, consistent with the Presidential Permit's conditions.

Democratic Position: "Good Jobs and Green Infrastructure"

Core Stance: Supportive, highlighting the project's potential to create union jobs, reduce emissions, and ease congestion for local communities.

Their Arguments:

  • ✓ Praises the thousands of new construction and permanent jobs the project is expected to create in South Texas.
  • ✓ Supports the environmental benefits of shifting freight from diesel trucks to low-emission electric shuttles.
  • ✓ Views the reduction of truck traffic on public roads as a major quality-of-life improvement for constituents in Laredo.

Legislative Strategy: To monitor the project's adherence to environmental regulations and labor standards and to advocate for federal cooperation to ensure the community benefits are realized.

Constitutional Check

The Verdict: ✓ Constitutional

Basis of Authority:

The President's authority to issue this permit stems from their constitutional power over foreign policy and international commerce. Congress has affirmed this through specific statutes.

[33 U.S.C. § 535d]: This federal law directs an applicant for an international bridge to submit their application to the Secretary of State, who then makes a recommendation to the President based on whether the project "is in the foreign policy interests of the United States." The President then makes the final decision to grant or deny the permit.

Constitutional Implications:

[Foreign Commerce and Affairs]: The approval of infrastructure connecting the United States to another sovereign nation is fundamentally a matter of foreign relations and commerce, powers constitutionally vested in the federal government, with the President playing a principal role.
[Precedent]: The practice of Presidents issuing permits for the construction of international bridges and pipelines has been established for over a century and has been consistently upheld by the courts as a legitimate exercise of executive authority.
[Federalism]: The permit explicitly requires the company to comply with all state and local laws and to obtain all necessary state and local permits, respecting the principles of federalism. [Source Document: Article 4]

Potential Legal Challenges:

While the President's authority to issue the permit is well-established, legal challenges could arise from other sources. Potential challenges could come from:

  • Environmental Organizations arguing that the project's Environmental Impact Statement is inadequate under the National Environmental Policy Act.
  • Landowners challenging the right-of-way acquisition process.
  • Local or state entities if they believe the project is not complying with regional laws and regulations.

Your Action Options

TO SUPPORT THIS PROJECT

5-Minute Actions:

  • Call Your Rep/Senators: Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121. "I'm a constituent from [Your City/Town] and I urge [Rep./Sen. Name] to support the swift and responsible implementation of the Green Corridors project authorized by the recent Presidential Permit."

30-Minute Deep Dive:

  • Write to Federal Agencies: Send comments to the Department of Transportation, Department of State, and the Environmental Protection Agency encouraging them to complete their reviews efficiently.
  • Follow Project Updates: Monitor the websites of Green Corridors and the Laredo Economic Development Corporation for public comment opportunities.

TO OPPOSE THIS PROJECT

5-Minute Actions:

  • Call Your Rep/Senators: Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121. "I'm a constituent from [Your City/Town] and I am concerned about the [environmental impact/impact on trucking jobs/landowner rights] of the Green Corridors project. I urge [Rep./Sen. Name] to ensure strict oversight."

30-Minute Deep Dive:

  • Write a Letter to the Editor: Submit a letter to your local newspaper outlining your concerns about the project's potential impact on the environment, local communities, or the existing trucking economy.
  • Join an Organization: Research and connect with environmental advocacy or transportation industry groups that may be monitoring and forming positions on the project.